top of page

Shakespeare & mindfulness

The cross-disciplinary inquiry that became the book: 
The Buddha and the Bard

One of them exquisitely rendered our human condition—inclusive of all its sufferings—on the stage. The other saw how to liberate us from that very condition. 


Here are the resonances of their encounter.

Join me on Instagram:


The Buddha and the Bard

The first edition was published with Mandala Press in 2022.

Screen Shot 2022-04-27 at 1.41.29 PM.png
Anchor 1

A biography of the book

"Who's there?" is the inquiry every spiritual tradition seeks to answer.


It also happens to be Hamlet’s remarkable, yet generally neglected, opening line. The question seemed a fertile site at which to begin listening for echoes between Shakespeare (the Bard) and spiritual practice. So—because I’m an embodied being living in the twenty-first century—I began to post reflections about those echoes on the internet.


See, if one works on a multi-year research and writing endeavor (in my case, it was a dissertation), it’s difficult to say when that endeavor is “over.” In 2018, I earned a PhD in early modern British literature from UC Santa Cruz, where I’d also been teaching courses on the Bard. I was clear at that point that I was done with academia. But Shakespeare? There’s no being done with him. His enchantment is life-long, insistent. I’d also been immersed in a seated, Buddhist-based meditation practice. And the resonances—the Dharma of Shakespeare—began to sing. 


I could point you to plenty of reasons why I think this was so. I could suggest that Shakespeare’s having been an actor before he was a dramatist endowed him with a mind that made room for all forms of experience. That in the practice of emptying-himself-of-himself, night after night, surely he began to perceive what Buddhism understands as the root of our suffering: that we are persons and personas (temporary individuals and transient “players”) who earnestly believe we’re permanent selves. I could place Shakespeare’s unrelenting metatheatrical play—the moments his characters recognize themselves as characters on a stage—alongside spiritual references to the theater as a metaphor for human incarnation. 


What was clear to me is that Shakespeare understood and represented human nature—including its suffering—better than any writer of his time. The Buddha, on the other hand, understood how to liberate us from it. That was the premise from which The Buddha and the Bard emerged. 


I've only just begun to uncover what I seek to uncover. The thing about spiritual practice—and, for me, about reading Shakespeare—is that if one is paying attention, one is necessarily in awe. And as an eternal student of this conversation, I am indeed in awe. 


And you? Where lies your awe?

One inquiry leads... to another

Recent press for The Buddha and the Bard

bottom of page